pgk1 mouse mab (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Pgk1 Mouse Mab, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 119 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/pgk1+mouse+mab/PGK1+Antibody/pmc12880806-471-0-8
Average 93 stars, based on 119 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Glycolysis-dependent sulfur metabolism orchestrates morphological plasticity and virulence in fungi"
Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent sulfur metabolism orchestrates morphological plasticity and virulence in fungi
Journal: eLife
doi: 10.7554/eLife.109075
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Epitope-tagged strains of various proteins involved in the de novo biosynthesis of sulfur-containing amino acids, including Met4, Met32, Met16, Met10, Cys4, and Cys3 were spotted on SLAD in the presence and absence of sub-inhibitory concentration of 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose (2DG) following which, cells from colonies were isolated at day 5 and levels of these proteins were assessed using Western blotting. Raw images of Western blots were analyzed using ImageJ to normalize targeted protein expression with the expression of housekeeping protein- β-actin, in order to generate densitometric graphs. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired t-test, **(p<0.01) and *(p<0.05). Error bars represent SEM. ( B ) Epitope-tagged strains of various proteins involved in the de novo biosynthesis of sulfur-containing amino acids, including Met32, Met16, Met10, and Cys3 were grown in liquid SLAD and then treated with sub-inhibitory concentration of 2DG for 24 hr after which protein expression was checked using Western blotting. Pgk1 was used as loading control. ( C ) Raw images of Western blots were analyzed using ImageJ to normalize targeted protein expression with the expression of housekeeping protein-Pgk1, in order to generate densitometric graphs. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired t-test, ***(p<0.001), **(p<0.01) and *(p<0.05). Error bars represent SEM. This figure was created using Biorender.com. Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Uncropped and labeled blots for . Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 2. Raw unedited blots for .
Techniques Used: Concentration Assay, Isolation, Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Labeling
Related Articles
Concentration Assay:Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent sulfur metabolism orchestrates morphological plasticity and virulence in fungi Article Snippet: Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent Sulfur Metabolism Orchestrates Morphological Plasticity and Virulence in Fungi Article Snippet: Isolation:Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent sulfur metabolism orchestrates morphological plasticity and virulence in fungi Article Snippet: Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent Sulfur Metabolism Orchestrates Morphological Plasticity and Virulence in Fungi Article Snippet: Western Blot:Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent sulfur metabolism orchestrates morphological plasticity and virulence in fungi Article Snippet: Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent Sulfur Metabolism Orchestrates Morphological Plasticity and Virulence in Fungi Article Snippet: Expressing:Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent sulfur metabolism orchestrates morphological plasticity and virulence in fungi Article Snippet: Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent Sulfur Metabolism Orchestrates Morphological Plasticity and Virulence in Fungi Article Snippet: Control:Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent sulfur metabolism orchestrates morphological plasticity and virulence in fungi Article Snippet: Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent Sulfur Metabolism Orchestrates Morphological Plasticity and Virulence in Fungi Article Snippet: Labeling:Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent sulfur metabolism orchestrates morphological plasticity and virulence in fungi Article Snippet: Article Title: Glycolysis-dependent Sulfur Metabolism Orchestrates Morphological Plasticity and Virulence in Fungi Article Snippet: |
![( A ) Representative super-resolution imaging for FlucSM split-GFP (spGFP) signal in mitochondria after 90 min estradiol induction. Top, maximum projection. Bottom, 3D rendering. OM: outer membrane labeled by Tom70-mCherry. ( B, C ) Representative images ( B ) and quantification ( C ) of time-dependent accumulation of FlucSM spGFP signal in mitochondria at 30°C after estradiol or ethanol treatment in HG medium. Shown in ( B ): top, FlucSM spGFP; middle: mitochondria labeled with Tom70-mCherry; bottom: merged images. Shown in ( C ): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity (n=3). Paired two-tailed t -test comparing 0 min and 90 min estradiol treatment. ( D, E ) Representative images ( D ) and quantification ( E ) of FlucWT, FlucSM, and FlucDM spGFP after 90 min estradiol treatment in HG medium. Shown in ( E ): means ± SEM of normalized spGFP intensities (n=4). Unpaired two-tailed t -test between FlucWT and FlucDM. ( F, G ) Representative images ( F ) and quantification ( G ) of FlucSM spGFP in cells that grew in HG, LG, and LG-Gly media. Shown in ( G ): means ± SEM of spGFP intensity (n=3). Paired two-tailed t -test. ( H, I ) Representative images ( H ) and quantification ( I ) of the nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation of Mig1-GFP. Shown in ( I ): means ± SEM of normalized Mig-GFP nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio (n=3). Paired (wild-type [WT] in HG vs. LG or LG-Gly) or unpaired (WT vs. Δreg1 in HG) two-tailed t -test, and one-way ANOVA for comparing Δreg1 in HG, WT in LG, and WT in LG-Gly. ( J ) Immunoblots of FlucSM-HA-GFP 11 and Grx5-HA-GFP 1-10 in cell lysates. Relative FlucSM levels <t>(FlucSM/Pgk1)</t> and relative Grx5 levels (matured Grx5/Pgk1) of three biological repeats are shown. Paired (HG vs. LG or LG-Gly) or unpaired (WT vs. Δreg1 in HG) two-tailed t -test. Asterisks indicate the precursor species of Grx5-HA-GFP 1-10 that are excluded from quantification. HG: 2% glucose; LG: 0.1% glucose plus 3% glycerol; LG-Gly: 0.1% glucose. EtOH: ethanol. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ns, not significant, p>0.05. Scale bars, 5 μm. Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Raw data for split-GFP (spGFP) intensity and Mig1-GFP quantification. Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 2. Raw and labeled immunoblots for .](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_9628/pmc11189628/pmc11189628__elife-87518-fig1-figsupp2.jpg)
Figure S2 E for quantification). Z-plane orthogonal projections of 3D cell images are shown. (C) Enhanced detection of RPA foci upon DNA-damage induction in strains expressing Rfa1-HA labeled with 2E2-NLS-Envy relative to the Rfa1-Envy strain. Rfa1-HA labeling with 2E2-Envy without NLS did not lead to enhanced detection of RPA foci relative to Rfa1-Envy. Results represent an average of three independent repeats, and error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). At least 240 cells were examined in each experiment. (D) Detection of Rfa1 expression in the labeled Rfa1-HA strains using WB analysis showing the dual usage of these strains for microscopy and WB analysis.
Figure 4I . Exposure times were as follows: 5 min and 10 s for α-HA blot, 1 min and 2 s for α-Pgk1 blot. Uncropped membrane images including the molecular weight are provided in Figure S8E). (I) Quantification of the membrane shown in 